Published on 

Speech on behalf of the Minister for Justice and Equality Mr. Alan Shatter T.D. by Minister Jan O'Sullivan on Resolution on the continuation in operation of Section 8 of the Criminal Justice (Amendment) Act 2009 -Seanad Éireann- Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Resolution  on  the  continuation in operation of Section 8 of the Criminal

Justice (Amendment) Act 2009

Resolution:

“That  Seanad  Éireann  resolves  that  section  8  of the Criminal Justice

(Amendment)  Act  2009 (No. 32 of 2009) shall continue in operation for the

period beginning on 30 June 2013 and ending on 29 June 2014.”

 

Speech  on behalf of the Minister for Justice and Equality Mr. Alan Shatter

T.D. by Minister of State Jan O'Sullivan T.D

 

 

A Chathaoirligh,

 

This Resolution will provide for the continuation in operation of section 8

of  the  Criminal  Justice  (Amendment)  Act  2009  for  a  12 month period

beginning on the 30th June 2013.

 

Let  me  briefly  remind  the House of the background to the 2009 Act, lest

anyone believe that it was an overreaction to a non-existent threat.

 

At  the  time  there  had been an increase in the level or organised crime.

Organised  gangs  had  shown a particular ruthlessness in their activities,

including attacks on witnesses and intimidation of jurors.  As a result the

Gardaí   were  encountering  difficulties  in  persuading  people  to  give

assistance  in  their  investigations.   The complete disregard which these

gangs  showed  for  human  lives  threatened  to subvert the entire justice

system.   In  the circumstances, it was imperative that the Government, and

the  Oireachtas,  take  the  necessary  steps  to  ensure that the criminal

justice  system  was  robust  enough  to  withstand  the  assault which was

launched upon it through intimidation and violence of witnesses and jurors.

The  measures  contained  in the Criminal Justice (Amendment) Act 2009 were

designed  to  tilt  the  balance  firmly  in  favour of the rule of law and

justice  and instil confidence in all that criminal gangs were not going to

be  permitted to frustrate criminal investigations or prosecutions of their

activities.

 

 

In  view  of the very real threat which these gangs posed, the Act provided

for  a  limited  number  of  specific  “organised  crime”  offences  to  be

prosecuted  in the Special Criminal Court.  The proposal to use the Special

Criminal Court for a limited number of organised crime offences removed the

possibility of jury tampering or intimidation of jurors.

 

So,  the  purpose  of  Section 8 is to ensure that organised criminal gangs

cannot  interfere  with  the  criminal  process to determine the outcome of

cases.  To  this  end  the  section  declares, that the ordinary courts are

inadequate  to  secure  the  effective  administration  of  justice and the

preservation  of  public  peace and order, in relation to certain offences.

The  offences  in question are the organised crime offences under Part 7 of

the Criminal Justice Act 2006.

 

Briefly, these offences are:

·    Directing the activities of a criminal organisation (Section 71A of the

   Criminal Justice Act 2006),

·    Participating  in  or  contributing to certain activities of a criminal

   organisation (Section 72),

·    Committing  a serious offence for a criminal organisation (Section 73),

   and

·   Liability for offences committed by a body corporate (Section 76).

 

Section  8  of  the  Criminal  Justice  (Amendment)  Act  2009  makes these

scheduled  offences  for the purposes of Part V of the Offences against the

State Act 1939.  While this means that the Special Criminal Court will hear

prosecutions   for  the  offences  in  question,  the  Director  of  Public

Prosecutions  may  still  exercise  his  power  to direct that the offences

should  be tried in the ordinary courts.  I believe, Cheann Comhairle, that

permitting  the  DPP  this  discretion maintains the fundamental balance in

deciding  which  cases  are appropriate to be tried in the Special Criminal

Court.

 

A  further bulwark in maintaining this balance is provided in Section 8 (4)

of  the  2009  Act.    It  provides  that  the section shall cease to be in

operation  unless  a  resolution  has  been  passed  by  each  House of the

Oireachtas  resolving  that  it  should continue in operation for a further

period to be decided by the Oireachtas. As I have already said, that is the

purpose of moving today’s Resolution

 

In  order  to  enable the House to decide on the continuation of section 8,

subsection  (6)  provides that before a resolution to continue section 8 in

operation  is  passed, the Minister for Justice and Equality must prepare a

report,  which  shall  be  laid before both Houses, on the operation of the

section in the period under report.  The Report, covering the period from 1

June 2012 to 31 May 2013 was laid before both Houses on the 17th June 2013.

 

The  Minister’s  reasons  for  seeking  the renewal of section 8 are clear.

Organised  crime  continues  to present a significant law enforcement issue

with  a  number  of  criminal gangs continuing to engage in serious crimes.

There  is,  unfortunately,  plenty  of evidence of the willingness of these

gangs  to  engage  in  murder,  armed  robbery, kidnapping, drug smuggling,

counterfeiting and other serious offences.

 

Given  the  nature  of  organised  crime, the investigation and prosecution

process  can  be  lengthy and difficult.  This is particularly so given the

insidious   power   that  criminal  gangs  hold  over  their  members  and,

regrettably,  within  the communities in which they live.  The 2009 Act has

been  in  operation  for  over four years and while there have been arrests

under the relevant sections of the Criminal Justice Act 2006, no cases have

yet come before the Special Criminal Court in accordance with section 8.

 

This  does  not,  however,  invalidate  the  reasoning  for  having  such a

provision available for use in appropriate circumstances. Let’s be clear  -

if  criminals are prepared to take human life, then they are quite prepared

to  subvert  the  system  of  justice.  Accordingly  there is necessity for

legislation  that  anticipates  this possibility to be in place. There is a

responsibility  on  the   Minister,  on  the Government and, indeed, on the

House,  to  ensure that our criminal law contains appropriate provisions to

ensure  the  effective  administration of justice by the courts. In my view

Section 8 is necessary in this regard.

 

The use of the Act to date also serves to highlight the considered approach

of  the  DPP  and vindicates the way in which the provision is constructed,

allowing her to exercise her discretion to direct that cases would be tried

in the ordinary courts.

 

In  his   report  to  the Minister on the operation of section 8, the Garda

Commissioner  is  of  the  clear  view  that this provision is likely to be

required  for  some time to come.  As Minister for Justice and Equality, he

must  have  the  utmost  regard  for  the views of the Garda authorities in

matters such as this.  It is absolutely essential to ensure that the Gardaí

have  at  their  disposal  the  best possible range of powers to face up to

organised criminal gangs.

 

In the period under report, there have been a total of 41 arrests under the

relevant  provisions  of the Criminal Justice Act 2006. One arrest was made

under Section 71A (directing the activities of a criminal organisation), 35

were  made  under  Section  72 (participating in or contributing to certain

activities  of  a  criminal organisation) and a further 5 arrests were made

under Section 73 (committing an offence for a criminal organisation).

 

Charges  have  resulted  in  12  of  these  cases for a variety of criminal

offences  including  aggravated burglary, vehicle theft, arson, handling of

stolen  goods  and the DPP has directed further charges of extortion in two

cases.

 

8  individuals  have been charged since the commencement of the 2006 Act, 2

under  Section  71(a) (directing the activities of a criminal organisation)

and  6  under  Section  72  (participating  in  or  contributing to certain

activities of a criminal organisation).

 

Three  individuals  have  been convicted under Section 72 and have received

sentences of three years in one case and nine years in the other two cases.

This includes the two individuals originally charged under section 71(a).

 

Five  other  charges  preferred  under  Section  72  (participating  in  or

contributing  to  certain  activities  of  a  criminal  organisation)  were

subsequently  withdrawn by the DPP. However four individuals were convicted

of  Conspiracy  to  rob  and  subsequently  received custodial sentences of

between  two and five years duration. One other individual was convicted of

offences  under  the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977/84 and received five years in

prison.

 

The  Garda authorities devote considerable resources, from across the Garda

organisation,  to  their efforts to tackle organised crime and they deserve

our  praise  for  the  successes  they  have  had against a number of those

involved  in  these criminal gangs.  Furthermore, the Commissioner has made

it  clear  time  and again that there will be no let up in the action taken

against  these  gangs.   He  has  the  Government's  full  support  in that

approach.

 

Let  me be blunt about it - the individuals involved in organised crime are

ruthless  people who will stop at nothing to avoid being brought to account

for  their  crimes.   Violence and intimidation are a way of life for these

people.   We,  that  is,  the Government and the Oireachtas, have a duty to

make  sure  that  the  criminal  justice system is equipped to prevent them

undermining our core values.

 

To  that  end, we must ensure that in the most serious of cases, where jury

intimidation  is a real possibility, the law has a means available to bring

serious criminals to account.

 

On balance, the Minister considers that it is necessary to continue section

8  in operation for a further period.  The period now proposed will run for

a period of 12 months beginning  30th June 2013.

 

I commend the Motion to the House.