Published on 

The need to review sentencing and collection of fines policy Deputy Eamonn Maloney Speech by Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence, Alan Shatter TD

Ceann Comhairle

I would like to thank Deputy Maloney for raising this very important issue.

As the Deputy will appreciate judges are independent in the matter of

sentencing, as in other matters concerning the exercise of judicial

functions, subject only to the Constitution and the law. In accordance with

this principle, the role of the Oireachtas has been to specify in law a

maximum penalty and a court, having considered all the circumstances of the

case, to impose an appropriate penalty up to that maximum. The court is

required to impose a sentence which is proportionate not only to the crime

but to the individual offender, in that process identifying where on the

sentencing range the particular case should lie and then applying any

mitigating factors which may be present.

From time to time, issues around consistency in sentencing and the

sentences imposed in high profile or particularly sensitive cases arise.

The Deputy will appreciate that as Minister for Justice, I cannot enter

public discourse on individual cases.  It is ultimately for the judge to

impose sentence taking into account all relevant factors.  However, I would

draw attention to an important safeguard - the power of the Director of

Public Prosecutions to apply to the Court of Criminal Appeal to review a

sentence she regards as unduly lenient.

The Deputy will be aware that the Law Reform Commission has recently

published a Report on Mandatory Sentencing.  Separately, I have established

a Strategic Review Group to consider penal policy including sentencing

policing. I expect the Group to report later this year and I intend to

publish its report.  The Group will take account of the recommendations of

the Law Reform Commission report in its deliberations and both reports will

be considered in due course.

Turning to the separate but related issue raised by Deputy Maloney, that of

fines.  Fines are the most commonly imposed sentence in our courts and I am

pleased to say that subject to the approval of the Government, the Fines

(Payment and Recovery) Bill will be published next week.

The overall objective of the Bill is one that I am sure is shared by the

Deputy and by most in this House. That objective is to reduce and to the

greatest extent possible, eliminate the need for judges to commit anyone to

prison for the non-payment of fines. Last year, some 8,300 people were sent

to prison for the non-payment of fines.  Those people comprised the vast

majority of those sentenced to short sentences by our courts and committed

to our prisons in 2012. The resources expended by all involved in the

justice system, from the judiciary to the Gardaí to the Courts Service to

the Prisons is staggering, at a time when resources are at a premium.

Prison is not the answer to the non-payment of a fine, except in

exceptional cases.

None of this is to say that I am sanguine about the non-payment of fines.

For our justice system to work, it must have the capacity to detect crime,

prosecute offenders and where they are convicted by our courts, to ensure

compliance with whatever sanction the courts impose.  Where fines are

concerned, this means collecting the fine.  It is regrettably the case that

a significant minority of around 30% of fines are not paid.  The Fines

(Payment and Recovery) Bill seeks to address this in a number of ways that

avoid the need to send defaulters to prison.  It provides that everyone can

pay a fine by instalments over 12 months and where a person is in default,

an attachment order may be made requiring his or her employer to collect

the fine and pay it over to the courts.  The Bill also provides that

community service order may be imposed in all cases of non-payment.

I am confident that the proposals contained in the Fines (Payment and

Recovery) Bill will achieve a significant reduction in the committal to

prison for the non-payment of fines, while protecting the principle that

sentences imposed by the courts must be served and where this involves a

fine, the fines payment and recovery system will strive to collect the fine

either from the person’s income or assets and failing that will impose

community service on the person.

Thank you