Published on 

Speech: Seanad Éireann - Adjournment Debate - Opening Remarks by Minister of State for Primary Care, Alex White, T.D on behalf of Minister Shatter

That the Minister for Justice, Equality & Defence give a breakdown as to

the cost per individual to the State of keeping asylum seekers in the

Direct Provision system, what is paid to the individuals and what is paid

to the service providers to accommodate them.

Senator Trevor Ó Clochartaigh

Statement on behalf of Minister for Justice, Equality and Defence by

Minister of State for Primary Care, Alex White, T.D:

I am responding on this subject today on behalf of my colleague, the

Minister for Justice and Equality, Mr. Alan Shatter, T.D.

In responding to this very specific motion, I feel it necessary, firstly,

to put on record what Direct Provision means and how we fulfill our

obligations to those persons who apply for international protection from

this State.

The policy of direct provision and dispersal is one of the central features

of the State’s asylum system. The Minister has recounted in responses to

Dáil Questions how the direct provision system was a necessary response to

the increasing number of asylum seekers arriving into the State given the

incapacity of the structures dealing with homelessness to cope with the

crisis.

Direct Provision is, essentially, a cashless system whereby the residents

of accommodation centres are provided with food and other services on a

full board basis. Residents do not have to pay for rent, electricity,

heating, food, maintenance or other costs. Health and education services

from mainstream hospitals/clinics and schools are provided in the same way

as for Irish citizens. Residents receive a weekly direct provision

allowance of €19.10 per adult and €9.60 per child. They are also entitled

to supports under the Community Welfare Scheme.

There are currently 4,836 persons seeking international protection residing

in 35 Direct Provision accommodation centres across 17 counties under

contract to the Reception & Integration Agency (RIA), an operational unit

of the Irish Naturalisation & Immigration Service (INIS) of the Department

of Justice and Equality. Three of these 35 centres are State owned: that

is to say, the land and buildings are owned by the State. But for all 35

centres, their management is provided by private companies under contract

to RIA.

RIA does not own, lease or rent premises from commercial contractors.

Rather, it 'contracts-in' a comprehensive range of services and facilities,

which include accommodation, housekeeping etc., for a fixed sum over the

period of the contract. The Minister has explained in numerous responses to

Dáil Questions that RIA negotiates separately with each contractor and it

is not in the interests of the taxpayer that details of rates paid to

individual contractors for current contracts are provided publicly.

Because of reducing numbers and significant cost cutting measures put in

place by RIA, the overall cost of the Direct Provision system in declining.

In 2008, RIA spent €91.5 million. In 2012, the estimate provision is €63.5

million and this represents a decline of 30% over four years. A breakdown

of these expenditure costs are shown on RIA's Annual Reports for the years

2007 to 2011 inclusive, which are published in its website.

Because different rates are paid to different contractors and because

residents receive a range of welfare, medical, legal and educational

benefits not covered in the RIA budget, a note of caution has to be sounded

in providing a statistic showing the cost per individual to the State of

keeping asylum seekers in the Direct Provision system.

Nonetheless, taking the overall RIA expenditure of €69.5 million in 2011

and the number of residents at the mid-point of that year – 5745 - then

this would represent a cost per RIA resident of just over €12,000 per year.

It is worth noting that in 2010, a Value for Money review of the Direct

Provision system found that – and I quote:

“From comparison with a number of options including social welfare and

self-catering, the chosen policy of direct provision was found to be the

best choice for a number of reasons. It is less costly, it is less likely

to act as an incentive to new asylum seekers (asylum shopping) and it

allows the State to manage the challenge of asylum seekers in a way that

reduces pressure on local services.”

A copy of that report is on the Oireachtas and RIA websites.